Demographics details for Hobart, IN vs Sacred heart, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobart, IN vs Sacred heart, MN.
| Data | Hobart | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,458 | 498 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 53.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,398 | $59,107 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Hobart vs Sacred heart
- In Hobart, the population is higher at 29,458, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
- The median age in Sacred heart is higher at 53.5 years, compared to 39.9 years in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $69,398 compared to $59,107 in Sacred heart.
- In Sacred heart, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 37.0% in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
- The unemployment rate in Hobart is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.1% in Sacred heart.
Demographics
Demographics Hobart vs Sacred heart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobart | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 63 | 87 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 17 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hobart vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hobart at 11% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sacred heart at 87% compared to 63% in Hobart.
- The Asian population is larger in Hobart at 2% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobart at 17% compared to 13% in Sacred heart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hobart at 7% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hobart and Sacred heart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobart | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 23.3% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 17.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobart vs Sacred heart
- More residents in Hobart report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobart at 24.5% compared to 23.3% in Sacred heart.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hobart at 18.6% compared to 17.7% in Sacred heart.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 18.9% in Hobart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobart at 38.1% compared to 37.6% in Sacred heart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 14.0% in Hobart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobart | Sacred heart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (217) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (7,227) | 28.1% (140) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (2,428) | 28.5% (142) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (4,813) | 13.3% (66) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobart vs Sacred heart
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
- In Sacred heart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 24.5% in Hobart.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sacred heart at 28.5%, compared to 8.2% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.