Demographics details for Hobart, IN vs Pocahontas, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobart, IN vs Pocahontas, AR.
| Data | Hobart | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,458 | 7,546 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $69,398 | $38,912 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hobart vs Pocahontas
- In Hobart, the population is higher at 29,458, compared to 7,546 in Pocahontas.
- Residents in Hobart have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 36.5 years in Pocahontas.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $69,398 compared to $38,912 in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Hobart and Pocahontas at 37.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Pocahontas at 19%, compared to 8% in Hobart.
- The unemployment rate in Hobart is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.5% in Pocahontas.
Demographics
Demographics Hobart vs Pocahontas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobart | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 63 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hobart vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hobart at 11% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pocahontas at 90% compared to 63% in Hobart.
- The Asian population is larger in Hobart at 2% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hobart at 17% compared to 1% in Pocahontas.
- Both Hobart and Pocahontas have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 7%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hobart and Pocahontas at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobart | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 22.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 29.9% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 27.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 43.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobart vs Pocahontas
- In Pocahontas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.0% compared to 16.5% in Hobart.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pocahontas at 29.9% versus 24.5% in Hobart.
- Pocahontas has a higher smoking rate at 27.1% compared to 18.6% in Hobart.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobart at 18.9% compared to 14.1% in Pocahontas.
- Pocahontas has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 38.1% in Hobart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pocahontas at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Hobart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobart | Pocahontas |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (217) | 0.5% (40) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (7,227) | 19.8% (1,491) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (2,428) | 15.7% (1,186) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (4,813) | 10.4% (782) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobart vs Pocahontas
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Pocahontas.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 19.8% in Pocahontas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pocahontas at 15.7%, compared to 8.2% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 10.4% in Pocahontas.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.