Demographics details for Hobart, IN vs Kingsland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobart, IN vs Kingsland, TX.
| Data | Hobart | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,458 | 7,075 |
| Median Age | 39.9 years | 52.3 years |
| Median Income | $69,398 | $54,366 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hobart vs Kingsland
- In Hobart, the population is higher at 29,458, compared to 7,075 in Kingsland.
- The median age in Kingsland is higher at 52.3 years, compared to 39.9 years in Hobart.
- Hobart has a higher median income of $69,398 compared to $54,366 in Kingsland.
- In Kingsland, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 37.0% in Hobart.
- The poverty level is higher in Kingsland at 9%, compared to 8% in Hobart.
- The unemployment rate in Hobart is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Kingsland.
Demographics
Demographics Hobart vs Kingsland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hobart | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 63 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 17 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hobart vs Kingsland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hobart at 11% compared to 1% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kingsland at 67% compared to 63% in Hobart.
- The Asian population is larger in Hobart at 2% compared to 1% in Kingsland.
- Kingsland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 17% in Hobart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kingsland at 12%, compared to 7% in Hobart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hobart and Kingsland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hobart | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 24.5% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 18.6% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 38.1% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobart vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 16.5% in Hobart.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kingsland at 26.8% versus 24.5% in Hobart.
- Kingsland has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 18.6% in Hobart.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobart at 18.9% compared to 17.9% in Kingsland.
- Kingsland has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 38.1% in Hobart.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kingsland at 24.0% compared to 14.0% in Hobart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hobart | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (217) | 1.3% (94) |
| High School Diploma | 24.5% (7,227) | 19.3% (1,363) |
| Less than High School | 8.2% (2,428) | 22.2% (1,568) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (4,813) | 18.7% (1,325) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobart vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.7% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 19.3% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kingsland at 22.2%, compared to 8.2% in Hobart.
- In Kingsland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 16.3% in Hobart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.