Demographics details for Hobart, IN vs Fort lupton, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hobart, IN vs Fort lupton, CO.
Data | Hobart | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,458 | 8,829 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $69,398 | $71,293 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hobart vs Fort lupton
- In Hobart, the population is higher at 29,458, compared to 8,829 in Fort lupton.
- Residents in Hobart have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 35.9 years in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher median income of $71,293, compared to $69,398 in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hobart at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Fort lupton.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort lupton at 10%, compared to 8% in Hobart.
- The unemployment rate in Hobart is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Fort lupton.
Demographics
Demographics Hobart vs Fort lupton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hobart | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | Data is updating |
White | 63 | 26 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 17 | 53 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 20 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hobart vs Fort lupton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hobart at 11% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Hobart has a higher percentage of White residents at 63% compared to 26% in Fort lupton.
- The Asian population is larger in Hobart at 2% compared to 0% in Fort lupton.
- Fort lupton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 53%, compared to 17% in Hobart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort lupton at 20%, compared to 7% in Hobart.
- In Fort lupton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hobart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hobart | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.5% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 11.8% |
Depression | 24.5% | 19.9% |
Smoking | 18.6% | 15.0% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 38.1% | 30.2% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hobart vs Fort lupton
- More residents in Hobart report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.8% in Fort lupton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hobart at 24.5% compared to 19.9% in Fort lupton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hobart at 18.6% compared to 15.0% in Fort lupton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hobart at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Fort lupton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hobart at 38.1% compared to 30.2% in Fort lupton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hobart at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fort lupton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hobart | Fort lupton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (217) | 1.6% (145) |
High School Diploma | 24.5% (7,227) | 16.2% (1,428) |
Less than High School | 8.2% (2,428) | 28.0% (2,476) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (4,813) | 7.0% (622) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hobart vs Fort lupton
- In Fort lupton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.7% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a high school diploma at 24.5% compared to 16.2% in Fort lupton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort lupton at 28.0%, compared to 8.2% in Hobart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hobart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 7.0% in Fort lupton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.