Demographics details for Ho ho kus, NJ vs Wattsburg, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ho ho kus, NJ vs Wattsburg, PA.
Data | Ho ho kus | Wattsburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,216 | 346 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 33.8 years |
Median Income | $250,001 | $49,688 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Wattsburg
- In Ho ho kus, the population is higher at 4,216, compared to 346 in Wattsburg.
- Residents in Ho ho kus have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 33.8 years in Wattsburg.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $49,688 in Wattsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ho ho kus at 52.0% compared to 40.0% in Wattsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Wattsburg at 8%, compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- Wattsburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Ho ho kus vs Wattsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ho ho kus | Wattsburg |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 67 | 95 |
Asian | 12 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Wattsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ho ho kus at 1% compared to 0% in Wattsburg.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Wattsburg at 95% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
- The Asian population is larger in Ho ho kus at 12% compared to 1% in Wattsburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Ho ho kus at 12% compared to 1% in Wattsburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Ho ho kus at 8% compared to 3% in Wattsburg.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ho ho kus and Wattsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ho ho kus | Wattsburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.2% | 17.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 5.8% | 11.8% |
Depression | 16.6% | 22.8% |
Smoking | 6.9% | 20.0% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 19.4% |
Obesity | 21.9% | 35.9% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Wattsburg
- In Wattsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wattsburg at 22.8% versus 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Wattsburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.0% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 19.4% in Wattsburg.
- Wattsburg has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wattsburg at 20.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ho ho kus | Wattsburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 2.8% (117) | 36.1% (125) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (83) | 19.7% (68) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 51.4% (2,167) | 8.4% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Wattsburg
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Ho ho kus and Wattsburg at 0.0%.
- In Wattsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 36.1% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wattsburg at 19.7%, compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ho ho kus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 8.4% in Wattsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.