Demographics details for Ho ho kus, NJ vs Fedscreek, KY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ho ho kus, NJ vs Fedscreek, KY.

Data Ho ho kus Fedscreek
Population 4,216 3,563
Median Age 43.0 years 38.2 years
Median Income $250,001 $37,431
Married Families 52.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.7

Population Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Fedscreek

  • In Ho ho kus, the population is higher at 4,216, compared to 3,563 in Fedscreek.
  • Residents in Ho ho kus have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 38.2 years in Fedscreek.
  • Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $37,431 in Fedscreek.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Ho ho kus at 52.0% compared to 36.0% in Fedscreek.
  • The poverty level is higher in Fedscreek at 15%, compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
  • Fedscreek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.

Demographics

Demographics Ho ho kus vs Fedscreek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ho ho kus Fedscreek
Black 1 1
White 67 94
Asian 12 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 1
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Fedscreek

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Ho ho kus and Fedscreek at 1%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Fedscreek at 94% compared to 67% in Ho ho kus.
  • The Asian population is larger in Ho ho kus at 12% compared to 0% in Fedscreek.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Ho ho kus at 12% compared to 1% in Fedscreek.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Ho ho kus at 8% compared to 4% in Fedscreek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Ho ho kus and Fedscreek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ho ho kus Fedscreek
Mental Health Not Good 11.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 5.8% Data is updating%
Depression 16.6% Data is updating%
Smoking 6.9% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 19.6% Data is updating%
Obesity 21.9% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 5.0% 33.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Fedscreek

  • More residents in Ho ho kus report poor mental health at 11.2% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Ho ho kus at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ho ho kus at 6.9% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Ho ho kus at 21.9% compared to 0.0% in Fedscreek.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fedscreek at 33.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ho ho kus Fedscreek
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 3.6% (129)
High School Diploma 2.8% (117) 22.2% (791)
Less than High School 2.0% (83) 42.4% (1,510)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 51.4% (2,167) 6.9% (245)

Education Levels Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Fedscreek

  • In Fedscreek, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • In Fedscreek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fedscreek at 42.4%, compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ho ho kus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 6.9% in Fedscreek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.