Demographics details for Ho ho kus, NJ vs Bakersfield, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Ho ho kus, NJ vs Bakersfield, CA.
Data | Ho ho kus | Bakersfield |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,216 | 410,647 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 31.5 years |
Median Income | $250,001 | $73,827 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Bakersfield
- The population in Bakersfield is higher at 410,647, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
- Residents in Ho ho kus have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 31.5 years in Bakersfield.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001 compared to $73,827 in Bakersfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Ho ho kus at 52.0% compared to 34.0% in Bakersfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Bakersfield at 21%, compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- Bakersfield has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics Ho ho kus vs Bakersfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Ho ho kus | Bakersfield |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 6 |
White | 67 | 18 |
Asian | 12 | 7 |
Hispanic | 12 | 52 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 16 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Bakersfield
- In Bakersfield, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of White residents at 67% compared to 18% in Bakersfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Ho ho kus at 12% compared to 7% in Bakersfield.
- Bakersfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 12% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bakersfield at 16%, compared to 8% in Ho ho kus.
- In Bakersfield, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Ho ho kus | Bakersfield |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 11.2% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 5.8% | 13.2% |
Depression | 16.6% | 19.5% |
Smoking | 6.9% | 15.6% |
Binge Drinking | 19.6% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 21.9% | 35.2% |
Disability Percentage | 5.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Bakersfield
- In Bakersfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bakersfield at 19.5% versus 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Bakersfield has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Binge drinking is more common in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 15.9% in Bakersfield.
- Bakersfield has higher obesity rates at 35.2% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bakersfield at 10.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Ho ho kus | Bakersfield |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.7% (6,851) |
High School Diploma | 2.8% (117) | 13.0% (53,563) |
Less than High School | 2.0% (83) | 20.5% (84,322) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 51.4% (2,167) | 13.8% (56,741) |
Education Levels Comparison: Ho ho kus vs Bakersfield
- In Bakersfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Bakersfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.0% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bakersfield at 20.5%, compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Ho ho kus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 13.8% in Bakersfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.