Demographics details for Hilo, HI vs South windsor, CT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hilo, HI vs South windsor, CT.
Data | Hilo | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Population | 47,627 | 26,054 |
Median Age | 41.5 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $75,589 | $90,964 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 62.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.9 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Hilo vs South windsor
- In Hilo, the population is higher at 47,627, compared to 26,054 in South windsor.
- The median age in South windsor is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 41.5 years in Hilo.
- South windsor has a higher median income of $90,964, compared to $75,589 in Hilo.
- In South windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 37.0% in Hilo.
- Hilo has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in South windsor.
- The unemployment rate in Hilo is higher at 3.9%, compared to 2.2% in South windsor.
Demographics
Demographics Hilo vs South windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hilo | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 9 |
White | 17 | 85 |
Asian | 31 | 3 |
Hispanic | 13 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 38 | 2 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hilo vs South windsor
- In South windsor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 1% in Hilo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South windsor at 85% compared to 17% in Hilo.
- The Asian population is larger in Hilo at 31% compared to 3% in South windsor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hilo at 13% compared to 3% in South windsor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hilo at 38% compared to 2% in South windsor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hilo and South windsor at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hilo | South windsor |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 16.0% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 13.4% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 19.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 25.5% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hilo vs South windsor
- More residents in Hilo report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hilo at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hilo at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hilo at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hilo at 25.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hilo at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hilo | South windsor |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.3% (141) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.1% (8,144) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 5.0% (2,395) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.2% (11,513) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hilo vs South windsor
- A higher percentage of residents in Hilo have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hilo hold a high school diploma at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- More residents in Hilo have less than a high school education at 5.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hilo hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.2% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.