Demographics details for Hillsville, VA vs Gilford, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hillsville, VA vs Gilford, NH.
Data | Hillsville | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,860 | 7,194 |
Median Age | 45.5 years | 47.5 years |
Median Income | $61,380 | $75,964 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 0.6% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Hillsville vs Gilford
- The population in Gilford is higher at 7,194, compared to 2,860 in Hillsville.
- The median age in Gilford is higher at 47.5 years, compared to 45.5 years in Hillsville.
- Gilford has a higher median income of $75,964, compared to $61,380 in Hillsville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hillsville at 42.0% compared to 0.6% in Gilford.
- Hillsville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Gilford.
- The unemployment rate in Hillsville is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.2% in Gilford.
Demographics
Demographics Hillsville vs Gilford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hillsville | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 0.5 |
White | 90 | 96.2 |
Asian | 1 | 0.7 |
Hispanic | 3 | 1.6 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1.0 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hillsville vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hillsville at 1% compared to 0.5% in Gilford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gilford at 96.2% compared to 90% in Hillsville.
- The Asian population is larger in Hillsville at 1% compared to 0.7% in Gilford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hillsville at 3% compared to 1.6% in Gilford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hillsville at 5% compared to 1.0% in Gilford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hillsville and Gilford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hillsville | Gilford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.4% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.8% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 27.0% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 21.2% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 37.2% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hillsville vs Gilford
- More residents in Hillsville report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hillsville at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hillsville at 21.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hillsville at 17.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hillsville at 37.2% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hillsville at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hillsville | Gilford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.1% (32) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 20.1% (575) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 21.0% (600) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (344) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hillsville vs Gilford
- A higher percentage of residents in Hillsville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hillsville hold a high school diploma at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- More residents in Hillsville have less than a high school education at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hillsville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Gilford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.