Demographics details for Highland, IL vs Lawrence, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Highland, IL vs Lawrence, KS.

Data Highland Lawrence
Population 10,009 95,794
Median Age 42.8 years 28.8 years
Median Income $75,779 $59,834
Married Families 44.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 7% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.9

Population Comparison: Highland vs Lawrence

  • The population in Lawrence is higher at 95,794, compared to 10,009 in Highland.
  • Residents in Highland have a higher median age of 42.8 years compared to 28.8 years in Lawrence.
  • Highland has a higher median income of $75,779 compared to $59,834 in Lawrence.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Highland at 44.0% compared to 32.0% in Lawrence.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 12%, compared to 7% in Highland.
  • Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Highland.

Demographics

Demographics Highland vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Highland Lawrence
Black Data is updating 5
White 94 71
Asian 3 6
Hispanic 1 7
Two or More Races 2 9
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Highland vs Lawrence

  • In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Highland.
  • Highland has a higher percentage of White residents at 94% compared to 71% in Lawrence.
  • In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Highland.
  • Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Highland.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 9%, compared to 2% in Highland.
  • In Lawrence, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Highland.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Highland Lawrence
Mental Health Not Good 16.2% 16.5%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 9.5%
Depression 21.5% 22.3%
Smoking 16.5% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 19.6%
Obesity 36.6% 32.8%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Highland vs Lawrence

  • In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 16.2% in Highland.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Lawrence at 22.3% versus 21.5% in Highland.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Highland at 16.5% compared to 14.8% in Lawrence.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 19.6% compared to 17.7% in Highland.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Highland at 36.6% compared to 32.8% in Lawrence.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Highland at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Lawrence.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Highland Lawrence
No Schooling 0.5% (48) 0.5% (466)
High School Diploma 20.0% (2,003) 8.2% (7,882)
Less than High School 5.7% (568) 4.0% (3,784)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.2% (2,224) 31.1% (29,776)

Education Levels Comparison: Highland vs Lawrence

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Highland and Lawrence at 0.5%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Highland hold a high school diploma at 20.0% compared to 8.2% in Lawrence.
  • More residents in Highland have less than a high school education at 5.7% compared to 4.0% in Lawrence.
  • In Lawrence, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.1% compared to 22.2% in Highland.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.