Demographics details for Highland park, IL vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Highland park, IL vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Highland park | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 30,163 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 48.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $159,567 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 54.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 4% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Highland park vs Coalinga
- In Highland park, the population is higher at 30,163, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Highland park have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Highland park has a higher median income of $159,567 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Highland park at 54.0% compared to 31.0% in Coalinga.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 4% in Highland park.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.9% in Highland park.
Demographics
Demographics Highland park vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Highland park | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 4 |
| White | 80 | 9 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Highland park vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Highland park.
- Highland park has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Highland park at 3% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 10% in Highland park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 6% in Highland park.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Highland park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Highland park | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 17.5% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 8.2% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 27.9% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Highland park vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 12.0% in Highland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Highland park at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 8.2% in Highland park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Highland park at 19.3% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 27.9% in Highland park.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Highland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Highland park | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (67) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 4.7% (1,407) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 3.3% (982) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.9% (16,564) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Highland park vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.2% in Highland park.
- In Coalinga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.8% compared to 4.7% in Highland park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 3.3% in Highland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Highland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.9% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.