Demographics details for Highland park, IL vs Chesapeake, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Highland park, IL vs Chesapeake, VA.

Data Highland park Chesapeake
Population 30,163 252,488
Median Age 48.0 years 37.4 years
Median Income $159,567 $92,703
Married Families 54.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 4% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 3.0

Population Comparison: Highland park vs Chesapeake

  • The population in Chesapeake is higher at 252,488, compared to 30,163 in Highland park.
  • Residents in Highland park have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 37.4 years in Chesapeake.
  • Highland park has a higher median income of $159,567 compared to $92,703 in Chesapeake.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Highland park at 54.0% compared to 43.0% in Chesapeake.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chesapeake at 8%, compared to 4% in Highland park.
  • The unemployment rate in Highland park is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.0% in Chesapeake.

Demographics

Demographics Highland park vs Chesapeake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Highland park Chesapeake
Black 1 29
White 80 53
Asian 3 4
Hispanic 10 7
Two or More Races 6 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Highland park vs Chesapeake

  • In Chesapeake, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 1% in Highland park.
  • Highland park has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 53% in Chesapeake.
  • In Chesapeake, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 3% in Highland park.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Highland park at 10% compared to 7% in Chesapeake.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chesapeake at 7%, compared to 6% in Highland park.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Highland park and Chesapeake at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Highland park Chesapeake
Mental Health Not Good 12.0% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 6.9% 10.0%
Depression 17.5% 20.9%
Smoking 8.2% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 19.3% 16.1%
Obesity 27.9% 36.1%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Highland park vs Chesapeake

  • In Chesapeake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 12.0% in Highland park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chesapeake at 20.9% versus 17.5% in Highland park.
  • Chesapeake has a higher smoking rate at 14.8% compared to 8.2% in Highland park.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Highland park at 19.3% compared to 16.1% in Chesapeake.
  • Chesapeake has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 27.9% in Highland park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chesapeake at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Highland park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Highland park Chesapeake
No Schooling 0.2% (67) 0.8% (2,039)
High School Diploma 4.7% (1,407) 13.1% (33,024)
Less than High School 3.3% (982) 7.0% (17,684)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 54.9% (16,564) 23.8% (60,160)

Education Levels Comparison: Highland park vs Chesapeake

  • In Chesapeake, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Highland park.
  • In Chesapeake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.1% compared to 4.7% in Highland park.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chesapeake at 7.0%, compared to 3.3% in Highland park.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Highland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.9% compared to 23.8% in Chesapeake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.