Demographics details for Highland park, IL vs Arvada, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Highland park, IL vs Arvada, CO.
Data | Highland park | Arvada |
---|---|---|
Population | 30,163 | 121,581 |
Median Age | 48.0 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $159,567 | $106,014 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 46.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Highland park vs Arvada
- The population in Arvada is higher at 121,581, compared to 30,163 in Highland park.
- Residents in Highland park have a higher median age of 48.0 years compared to 40.2 years in Arvada.
- Highland park has a higher median income of $159,567 compared to $106,014 in Arvada.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Highland park at 54.0% compared to 46.0% in Arvada.
- The poverty level is higher in Arvada at 6%, compared to 4% in Highland park.
- The unemployment rate in Highland park is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.8% in Arvada.
Demographics
Demographics Highland park vs Arvada provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Highland park | Arvada |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 80 | 73 |
Asian | 3 | 2 |
Hispanic | 10 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Highland park vs Arvada
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Highland park and Arvada at 1%.
- Highland park has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 73% in Arvada.
- The Asian population is larger in Highland park at 3% compared to 2% in Arvada.
- Arvada has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 10% in Highland park.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Arvada at 9%, compared to 6% in Highland park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Highland park and Arvada at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Highland park | Arvada |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.0% | 14.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 6.9% | 9.2% |
Depression | 17.5% | 20.9% |
Smoking | 8.2% | 13.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 22.1% |
Obesity | 27.9% | 24.6% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Highland park vs Arvada
- In Arvada, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 12.0% in Highland park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Arvada at 20.9% versus 17.5% in Highland park.
- Arvada has a higher smoking rate at 13.8% compared to 8.2% in Highland park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Arvada at 22.1% compared to 19.3% in Highland park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Highland park at 27.9% compared to 24.6% in Arvada.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Arvada at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Highland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Highland park | Arvada |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (67) | 0.4% (483) |
High School Diploma | 4.7% (1,407) | 12.7% (15,387) |
Less than High School | 3.3% (982) | 6.6% (8,032) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 54.9% (16,564) | 35.1% (42,624) |
Education Levels Comparison: Highland park vs Arvada
- In Arvada, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Highland park.
- In Arvada, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.7% compared to 4.7% in Highland park.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arvada at 6.6%, compared to 3.3% in Highland park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Highland park hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 54.9% compared to 35.1% in Arvada.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.