Demographics details for High point, NC vs Yakima, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in High point, NC vs Yakima, WA.
| Data | High point | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,067 | 97,012 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $58,582 | $55,734 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: High point vs Yakima
- In High point, the population is higher at 115,067, compared to 97,012 in Yakima.
- Residents in High point have a higher median age of 37.7 years compared to 33.9 years in Yakima.
- High point has a higher median income of $58,582 compared to $55,734 in Yakima.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in High point at 35.0% compared to 33.0% in Yakima.
- The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 15% in High point.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both High point and Yakima at 5.4%.
Demographics
Demographics High point vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | High point | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 1 |
| White | 42 | 34 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: High point vs Yakima
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in High point at 32% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- High point has a higher percentage of White residents at 42% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- The Asian population is larger in High point at 8% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 11% in High point.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 7% in High point.
- In Yakima, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in High point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | High point | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: High point vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.4% in High point.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yakima at 23.6% versus 23.0% in High point.
- Yakima has a higher smoking rate at 17.4% compared to 17.1% in High point.
- Binge drinking is more common in High point at 15.5% compared to 15.4% in Yakima.
- Yakima has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 36.1% in High point.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Yakima at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in High point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | High point | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,587) | 1.8% (1,748) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,564) | 13.4% (12,983) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (14,768) | 27.9% (27,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (25,678) | 12.1% (11,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: High point vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in High point.
- A higher percentage of residents in High point hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 12.8% in High point.
- A higher percentage of residents in High point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 12.1% in Yakima.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.