Demographics details for High point, NC vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in High point, NC vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | High point | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,067 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $58,582 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: High point vs Sulphur
- In High point, the population is higher at 115,067, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Sulphur is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 37.7 years in High point.
- High point has a higher median income of $58,582 compared to $55,951 in Sulphur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in High point at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Sulphur.
- High point has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 14% in Sulphur.
- The unemployment rate in High point is higher at 5.4%, compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics High point vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | High point | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 2 |
| White | 42 | 60 |
| Asian | 8 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: High point vs Sulphur
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in High point at 32% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur at 60% compared to 42% in High point.
- The Asian population is larger in High point at 8% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 11% in High point.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 7% in High point.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in High point.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | High point | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: High point vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.4% in High point.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 25.3% versus 23.0% in High point.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.4% compared to 17.1% in High point.
- Binge drinking is more common in High point at 15.5% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 36.1% in High point.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in High point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | High point | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,587) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,564) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (14,768) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (25,678) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: High point vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 1.4% in High point.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 13.5% in High point.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 12.8% in High point.
- A higher percentage of residents in High point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.