Demographics details for High point, NC vs Sterling heights, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in High point, NC vs Sterling heights, MI.

Data High point Sterling heights
Population 115,067 132,567
Median Age 37.7 years 41.2 years
Median Income $58,582 $75,381
Married Families 35.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 15% 8%
Unemployment Rate 5.4 4.7

Population Comparison: High point vs Sterling heights

  • The population in Sterling heights is higher at 132,567, compared to 115,067 in High point.
  • The median age in Sterling heights is higher at 41.2 years, compared to 37.7 years in High point.
  • Sterling heights has a higher median income of $75,381, compared to $58,582 in High point.
  • In Sterling heights, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in High point.
  • High point has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Sterling heights.
  • The unemployment rate in High point is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.7% in Sterling heights.

Demographics

Demographics High point vs Sterling heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic High point Sterling heights
Black 32 6
White 42 79
Asian 8 9
Hispanic 11 2
Two or More Races 7 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: High point vs Sterling heights

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in High point at 32% compared to 6% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Sterling heights at 79% compared to 42% in High point.
  • In Sterling heights, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 8% in High point.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in High point at 11% compared to 2% in Sterling heights.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in High point at 7% compared to 4% in Sterling heights.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both High point and Sterling heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric High point Sterling heights
Mental Health Not Good 16.4% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.1% 11.4%
Depression 23.0% 25.5%
Smoking 17.1% 19.8%
Binge Drinking 15.5% 17.7%
Obesity 36.1% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: High point vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 16.4% in High point.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Sterling heights at 25.5% versus 23.0% in High point.
  • Sterling heights has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 17.1% in High point.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Sterling heights at 17.7% compared to 15.5% in High point.
  • Sterling heights has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 36.1% in High point.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sterling heights at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in High point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level High point Sterling heights
No Schooling 1.4% (1,587) 2.4% (3,134)
High School Diploma 13.5% (15,564) 18.8% (24,937)
Less than High School 12.8% (14,768) 16.6% (22,008)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 22.3% (25,678) 22.3% (29,518)

Education Levels Comparison: High point vs Sterling heights

  • In Sterling heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.4% compared to 1.4% in High point.
  • In Sterling heights, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.8% compared to 13.5% in High point.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sterling heights at 16.6%, compared to 12.8% in High point.
  • The percentage of residents with a bachelor's degree or higher is identical in both High point and Sterling heights at 22.3%.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.