Demographics details for High point, NC vs Laconia, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in High point, NC vs Laconia, NH.
| Data | High point | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 115,067 | 17,086 |
| Median Age | 37.7 years | 43.7 years |
| Median Income | $58,582 | $67,856 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: High point vs Laconia
- In High point, the population is higher at 115,067, compared to 17,086 in Laconia.
- The median age in Laconia is higher at 43.7 years, compared to 37.7 years in High point.
- Laconia has a higher median income of $67,856, compared to $58,582 in High point.
- In Laconia, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in High point.
- High point has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Laconia.
- The unemployment rate in High point is higher at 5.4%, compared to 2.4% in Laconia.
Demographics
Demographics High point vs Laconia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | High point | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 32 | 1 |
| White | 42 | 93 |
| Asian | 8 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: High point vs Laconia
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in High point at 32% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laconia at 93% compared to 42% in High point.
- The Asian population is larger in High point at 8% compared to 1% in Laconia.
- The Hispanic community is larger in High point at 11% compared to 3% in Laconia.
- More residents identify as two or more races in High point at 7% compared to 2% in Laconia.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both High point and Laconia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | High point | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 23.0% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 36.1% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: High point vs Laconia
- In Laconia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.4% in High point.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laconia at 24.9% versus 23.0% in High point.
- Laconia has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 17.1% in High point.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laconia at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in High point.
- Obesity rates are higher in High point at 36.1% compared to 31.5% in Laconia.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Laconia at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in High point.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | High point | Laconia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (1,587) | 0.4% (61) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,564) | 18.9% (3,229) |
| Less than High School | 12.8% (14,768) | 12.6% (2,158) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (25,678) | 19.7% (3,364) |
Education Levels Comparison: High point vs Laconia
- A higher percentage of residents in High point have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.4% in Laconia.
- In Laconia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 13.5% in High point.
- More residents in High point have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 12.6% in Laconia.
- A higher percentage of residents in High point hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 19.7% in Laconia.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.