Demographics details for High point, NC vs Ho ho kus, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in High point, NC vs Ho ho kus, NJ.
Data | High point | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Population | 115,067 | 4,216 |
Median Age | 37.7 years | 43.0 years |
Median Income | $58,582 | $250,001 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: High point vs Ho ho kus
- In High point, the population is higher at 115,067, compared to 4,216 in Ho ho kus.
- The median age in Ho ho kus is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 37.7 years in High point.
- Ho ho kus has a higher median income of $250,001, compared to $58,582 in High point.
- In Ho ho kus, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 35.0% in High point.
- High point has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Ho ho kus.
- The unemployment rate in High point is higher at 5.4%, compared to 2.5% in Ho ho kus.
Demographics
Demographics High point vs Ho ho kus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | High point | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Black | 32 | 1 |
White | 42 | 67 |
Asian | 8 | 12 |
Hispanic | 11 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: High point vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in High point at 32% compared to 1% in Ho ho kus.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ho ho kus at 67% compared to 42% in High point.
- In Ho ho kus, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 8% in High point.
- Ho ho kus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 11% in High point.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ho ho kus at 8%, compared to 7% in High point.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both High point and Ho ho kus at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | High point | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.4% | 11.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.1% | 5.8% |
Depression | 23.0% | 16.6% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 6.9% |
Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 19.6% |
Obesity | 36.1% | 21.9% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: High point vs Ho ho kus
- More residents in High point report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 11.2% in Ho ho kus.
- Depression is more prevalent in High point at 23.0% compared to 16.6% in Ho ho kus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in High point at 17.1% compared to 6.9% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ho ho kus at 19.6% compared to 15.5% in High point.
- Obesity rates are higher in High point at 36.1% compared to 21.9% in Ho ho kus.
- Disability percentages are higher in High point at 12.0% compared to 5.0% in Ho ho kus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | High point | Ho ho kus |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (1,587) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (15,564) | 2.8% (117) |
Less than High School | 12.8% (14,768) | 2.0% (83) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.3% (25,678) | 51.4% (2,167) |
Education Levels Comparison: High point vs Ho ho kus
- A higher percentage of residents in High point have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Ho ho kus.
- A higher percentage of residents in High point hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 2.8% in Ho ho kus.
- More residents in High point have less than a high school education at 12.8% compared to 2.0% in Ho ho kus.
- In Ho ho kus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 51.4% compared to 22.3% in High point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.