Demographics details for Hickory, NC vs Bethlehem, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hickory, NC vs Bethlehem, PA.
Data | Hickory | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Population | 44,084 | 77,617 |
Median Age | 37.9 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $58,251 | $62,072 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Hickory vs Bethlehem
- The population in Bethlehem is higher at 77,617, compared to 44,084 in Hickory.
- Residents in Hickory have a higher median age of 37.9 years compared to 35.9 years in Bethlehem.
- Bethlehem has a higher median income of $62,072, compared to $58,251 in Hickory.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hickory at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in Bethlehem.
- The poverty level is higher in Bethlehem at 13%, compared to 12% in Hickory.
- The unemployment rate in Hickory is higher at 4.3%, compared to 3.5% in Bethlehem.
Demographics
Demographics Hickory vs Bethlehem provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hickory | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Black | 13 | 9 |
White | 62 | 47 |
Asian | 4 | 3 |
Hispanic | 13 | 30 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hickory vs Bethlehem
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hickory at 13% compared to 9% in Bethlehem.
- Hickory has a higher percentage of White residents at 62% compared to 47% in Bethlehem.
- The Asian population is larger in Hickory at 4% compared to 3% in Bethlehem.
- Bethlehem has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 13% in Hickory.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bethlehem at 11%, compared to 7% in Hickory.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hickory at 1% compared to 0% in Bethlehem.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hickory | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.3% | 12.1% |
Depression | 24.8% | 21.8% |
Smoking | 18.1% | 18.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.2% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 37.7% | 34.7% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hickory vs Bethlehem
- More residents in Hickory report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.9% in Bethlehem.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hickory at 24.8% compared to 21.8% in Bethlehem.
- Bethlehem has a higher smoking rate at 18.4% compared to 18.1% in Hickory.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bethlehem at 17.6% compared to 17.2% in Hickory.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hickory at 37.7% compared to 34.7% in Bethlehem.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bethlehem at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Hickory.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hickory | Bethlehem |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (306) | 0.6% (452) |
High School Diploma | 13.1% (5,797) | 16.9% (13,125) |
Less than High School | 11.4% (5,022) | 12.9% (10,045) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.0% (10,580) | 22.0% (17,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hickory vs Bethlehem
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickory have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Bethlehem.
- In Bethlehem, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.9% compared to 13.1% in Hickory.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bethlehem at 12.9%, compared to 11.4% in Hickory.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickory hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Bethlehem.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.