Demographics details for Hickman, TN vs Baltic, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hickman, TN vs Baltic, SD.
| Data | Hickman | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,455 | 1,322 |
| Median Age | 41.8 years | 30.1 years |
| Median Income | $54,669 | $94,167 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Hickman vs Baltic
- In Hickman, the population is higher at 25,455, compared to 1,322 in Baltic.
- Residents in Hickman have a higher median age of 41.8 years compared to 30.1 years in Baltic.
- Baltic has a higher median income of $94,167, compared to $54,669 in Hickman.
- In Baltic, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 40.0% in Hickman.
- Hickman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Baltic.
- The unemployment rate in Hickman is higher at 3.1%, compared to 2.5% in Baltic.
Demographics
Demographics Hickman vs Baltic provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hickman | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 92 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hickman vs Baltic
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hickman at 3% compared to 1% in Baltic.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Baltic at 92% compared to 89% in Hickman.
- The Asian population is larger in Hickman at 1% compared to 0% in Baltic.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hickman at 3% compared to 1% in Baltic.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Baltic at 5%, compared to 4% in Hickman.
- In Baltic, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hickman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hickman | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.9% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 24.6% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 37.0% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hickman vs Baltic
- More residents in Hickman report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 13.1% in Baltic.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hickman at 28.4% compared to 19.9% in Baltic.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hickman at 24.6% compared to 15.0% in Baltic.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Baltic at 23.1% compared to 16.2% in Hickman.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hickman at 37.0% compared to 34.5% in Baltic.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hickman at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Baltic.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hickman | Baltic |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (185) | 0.2% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (5,594) | 15.1% (199) |
| Less than High School | 23.4% (5,965) | 3.6% (48) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.7% (2,226) | 19.1% (252) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hickman vs Baltic
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Baltic.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 15.1% in Baltic.
- More residents in Hickman have less than a high school education at 23.4% compared to 3.6% in Baltic.
- In Baltic, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 8.7% in Hickman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.