Demographics details for Hickman, KY vs Provo, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hickman, KY vs Provo, UT.
Data | Hickman | Provo |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,422 | 113,523 |
Median Age | 46.6 years | 23.6 years |
Median Income | $68,589 | $57,943 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Hickman vs Provo
- The population in Provo is higher at 113,523, compared to 4,422 in Hickman.
- Residents in Hickman have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 23.6 years in Provo.
- Hickman has a higher median income of $68,589 compared to $57,943 in Provo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hickman at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Provo.
- Hickman has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Provo.
- The unemployment rate in Hickman is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.0% in Provo.
Demographics
Demographics Hickman vs Provo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hickman | Provo |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 1 |
White | 85 | 69 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hickman vs Provo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hickman at 10% compared to 1% in Provo.
- Hickman has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 69% in Provo.
- In Provo, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Hickman.
- Provo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Hickman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Provo at 9%, compared to 3% in Hickman.
- In Provo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hickman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hickman | Provo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 16.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 12.0% |
Depression | 27.9% | 24.5% |
Smoking | 23.5% | 8.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 7.3% |
Obesity | 38.9% | 33.5% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hickman vs Provo
- More residents in Hickman report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 16.3% in Provo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hickman at 27.9% compared to 24.5% in Provo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hickman at 23.5% compared to 8.4% in Provo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hickman at 14.4% compared to 7.3% in Provo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hickman at 38.9% compared to 33.5% in Provo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hickman at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Provo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hickman | Provo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (11) | 0.6% (663) |
High School Diploma | 23.3% (1,029) | 4.6% (5,209) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (685) | 5.7% (6,435) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (728) | 18.3% (20,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hickman vs Provo
- In Provo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Hickman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman hold a high school diploma at 23.3% compared to 4.6% in Provo.
- More residents in Hickman have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 5.7% in Provo.
- In Provo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 16.5% in Hickman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.