Demographics details for Hickman, KY vs Port arthur, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hickman, KY vs Port arthur, TX.
| Data | Hickman | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,422 | 55,579 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 33.7 years |
| Median Income | $68,589 | $45,357 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 11.0 |
Population Comparison: Hickman vs Port arthur
- The population in Port arthur is higher at 55,579, compared to 4,422 in Hickman.
- Residents in Hickman have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 33.7 years in Port arthur.
- Hickman has a higher median income of $68,589 compared to $45,357 in Port arthur.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hickman at 41.0% compared to 30.0% in Port arthur.
- The poverty level is higher in Port arthur at 23%, compared to 12% in Hickman.
- Port arthur has a higher unemployment rate at 11.0% compared to 5.7% in Hickman.
Demographics
Demographics Hickman vs Port arthur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hickman | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 43 |
| White | 85 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hickman vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 10% in Hickman.
- Hickman has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 3% in Port arthur.
- In Port arthur, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Hickman.
- Port arthur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 2% in Hickman.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port arthur at 13%, compared to 3% in Hickman.
- In Port arthur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hickman.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hickman | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.9% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 23.5% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 42.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hickman vs Port arthur
- More residents in Hickman report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 19.5% in Port arthur.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hickman at 27.9% compared to 20.4% in Port arthur.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hickman at 23.5% compared to 23.3% in Port arthur.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hickman at 14.4% compared to 13.9% in Port arthur.
- Port arthur has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 38.9% in Hickman.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hickman at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Port arthur.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hickman | Port arthur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (11) | 2.5% (1,383) |
| High School Diploma | 23.3% (1,029) | 19.6% (10,902) |
| Less than High School | 15.5% (685) | 23.7% (13,180) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (728) | 7.1% (3,955) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hickman vs Port arthur
- In Port arthur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.2% in Hickman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman hold a high school diploma at 23.3% compared to 19.6% in Port arthur.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port arthur at 23.7%, compared to 15.5% in Hickman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 7.1% in Port arthur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.