Demographics details for Hickman, KY vs Bennington, VT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hickman, KY vs Bennington, VT.
Data | Hickman | Bennington |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,422 | 15,764 |
Median Age | 46.6 years | 42.5 years |
Median Income | $68,589 | $55,000 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 53.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Hickman vs Bennington
- The population in Bennington is higher at 15,764, compared to 4,422 in Hickman.
- Residents in Hickman have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 42.5 years in Bennington.
- Hickman has a higher median income of $68,589 compared to $55,000 in Bennington.
- In Bennington, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 41.0% in Hickman.
- The poverty level is higher in Bennington at 13%, compared to 12% in Hickman.
- The unemployment rate in Hickman is higher at 5.7%, compared to 2.9% in Bennington.
Demographics
Demographics Hickman vs Bennington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hickman | Bennington |
---|---|---|
Black | 10 | 1 |
White | 85 | 95 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hickman vs Bennington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hickman at 10% compared to 1% in Bennington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bennington at 95% compared to 85% in Hickman.
- In Bennington, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Hickman.
- Bennington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Hickman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hickman at 3% compared to 0% in Bennington.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hickman and Bennington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hickman | Bennington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.6% | Data is updating% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | Data is updating% |
Depression | 27.9% | Data is updating% |
Smoking | 23.5% | Data is updating% |
Binge Drinking | 14.4% | Data is updating% |
Obesity | 38.9% | Data is updating% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hickman vs Bennington
- More residents in Hickman report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hickman at 27.9% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hickman at 23.5% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hickman at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hickman at 38.9% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hickman at 20.0% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hickman | Bennington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (11) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 23.3% (1,029) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (685) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (728) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hickman vs Bennington
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman hold a high school diploma at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- More residents in Hickman have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hickman hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in Bennington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.