Demographics details for Heyburn, ID vs Woodstock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heyburn, ID vs Woodstock, VA.
| Data | Heyburn | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,640 | 5,907 |
| Median Age | 26.5 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $61,443 | $64,470 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Heyburn vs Woodstock
- The population in Woodstock is higher at 5,907, compared to 3,640 in Heyburn.
- The median age in Woodstock is higher at 38.4 years, compared to 26.5 years in Heyburn.
- Woodstock has a higher median income of $64,470, compared to $61,443 in Heyburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Heyburn at 42.0% compared to 32.0% in Woodstock.
- Heyburn has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 10% in Woodstock.
- The unemployment rate in Heyburn is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Woodstock.
Demographics
Demographics Heyburn vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heyburn | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 6 |
| White | 70 | 60 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 25 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heyburn vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 0% in Heyburn.
- Heyburn has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 60% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Heyburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Heyburn at 25% compared to 19% in Woodstock.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 11%, compared to 3% in Heyburn.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Heyburn at 2% compared to 0% in Woodstock.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heyburn | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 18.5% | 18.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 37.2% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heyburn vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.8% in Heyburn.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Woodstock at 24.9% versus 22.9% in Heyburn.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Heyburn at 18.5% compared to 18.2% in Woodstock.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 16.2% compared to 14.9% in Heyburn.
- Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 37.2% in Heyburn.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Heyburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heyburn | Woodstock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (15) | 2.0% (118) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (745) | 19.0% (1,121) |
| Less than High School | 19.1% (694) | 17.2% (1,018) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.3% (447) | 16.4% (968) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heyburn vs Woodstock
- In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.4% in Heyburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heyburn hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 19.0% in Woodstock.
- More residents in Heyburn have less than a high school education at 19.1% compared to 17.2% in Woodstock.
- In Woodstock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 12.3% in Heyburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.