Demographics details for Hesperia, CA vs Friendship, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hesperia, CA vs Friendship, WI.
| Data | Hesperia | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 100,744 | 681 |
| Median Age | 32.2 years | 50.3 years |
| Median Income | $67,698 | $45,208 |
| Married Families | 34.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 13% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hesperia vs Friendship
- In Hesperia, the population is higher at 100,744, compared to 681 in Friendship.
- The median age in Friendship is higher at 50.3 years, compared to 32.2 years in Hesperia.
- Hesperia has a higher median income of $67,698 compared to $45,208 in Friendship.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hesperia at 34.0% compared to 33.0% in Friendship.
- Hesperia has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 12% in Friendship.
- The unemployment rate in Hesperia is higher at 6.9%, compared to 4.5% in Friendship.
Demographics
Demographics Hesperia vs Friendship provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hesperia | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 15 | 84 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 62 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 9 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hesperia vs Friendship
- In Friendship, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Hesperia.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Friendship at 84% compared to 15% in Hesperia.
- The Asian population is larger in Hesperia at 2% compared to 0% in Friendship.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hesperia at 62% compared to 1% in Friendship.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hesperia at 16% compared to 9% in Friendship.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hesperia and Friendship at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hesperia | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.3% |
| Smoking | 16.0% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.5% | 23.9% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hesperia vs Friendship
- More residents in Hesperia report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.1% in Friendship.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Friendship at 24.3% versus 20.1% in Hesperia.
- Friendship has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 16.0% in Hesperia.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Friendship at 23.9% compared to 15.5% in Hesperia.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hesperia at 40.4% compared to 39.3% in Friendship.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Friendship at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Hesperia.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hesperia | Friendship |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (1,604) | 0.4% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (18,342) | 26.9% (183) |
| Less than High School | 25.4% (25,622) | 26.0% (177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.5% (6,534) | 3.2% (22) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hesperia vs Friendship
- A higher percentage of residents in Hesperia have no formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.4% in Friendship.
- In Friendship, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 18.2% in Hesperia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Friendship at 26.0%, compared to 25.4% in Hesperia.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hesperia hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.5% compared to 3.2% in Friendship.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.