Demographics details for Heppner, OR vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heppner, OR vs South jordan, UT.
| Data | Heppner | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,172 | 83,513 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 34.4 years |
| Median Income | $46,708 | $119,822 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Heppner vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- Residents in Heppner have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 34.4 years in South jordan.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $46,708 in Heppner.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 43.0% in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Heppner is higher at 5.7%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Heppner vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heppner | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Heppner vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Heppner at 1% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- Heppner has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 83% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Heppner.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 6% in Heppner.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Heppner at 7% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Heppner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heppner | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 9.0% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 7.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 35.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heppner vs South jordan
- More residents in Heppner report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Heppner at 27.6% compared to 26.5% in South jordan.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Heppner at 16.2% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 16.9% in South jordan.
- Obesity rates are higher in Heppner at 34.4% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heppner | South jordan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.2% (172) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (258) | 8.4% (6,995) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (110) | 2.7% (2,236) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (115) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heppner vs South jordan
- In South jordan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heppner hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Heppner have less than a high school education at 9.4% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 9.8% in Heppner.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.