Demographics details for Heppner, OR vs Lawrence, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heppner, OR vs Lawrence, MA.
| Data | Heppner | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,172 | 87,954 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,708 | $53,977 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Heppner vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 87,954, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- Residents in Heppner have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 31.5 years in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $53,977, compared to $46,708 in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Heppner at 43.0% compared to 26.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 10% in Heppner.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 5.7% in Heppner.
Demographics
Demographics Heppner vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heppner | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 86 | -4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 82 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heppner vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Heppner.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 82%, compared to 6% in Heppner.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 7% in Heppner.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Heppner and Lawrence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heppner | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 35.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heppner vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.5% in Heppner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Heppner at 27.6% compared to 22.4% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 16.2% in Heppner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 14.5% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 34.4% in Heppner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 14.0% in Lawrence.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heppner | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.7% (2,366) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (258) | 18.6% (16,316) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (110) | 34.1% (29,963) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (115) | 9.2% (8,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heppner vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heppner hold a high school diploma at 22.0% compared to 18.6% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lawrence at 34.1%, compared to 9.4% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heppner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 9.2% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.