Demographics details for Heppner, OR vs Lashmeet, WV
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heppner, OR vs Lashmeet, WV.
| Data | Heppner | Lashmeet |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,172 | 704 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 61.1 years |
| Median Income | $46,708 | $43,701 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.7 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Heppner vs Lashmeet
- In Heppner, the population is higher at 1,172, compared to 704 in Lashmeet.
- The median age in Lashmeet is higher at 61.1 years, compared to 39.1 years in Heppner.
- Heppner has a higher median income of $46,708 compared to $43,701 in Lashmeet.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Heppner at 43.0% compared to 38.0% in Lashmeet.
- Heppner has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
- The unemployment rate in Heppner is higher at 5.7%, compared to 4.0% in Lashmeet.
Demographics
Demographics Heppner vs Lashmeet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heppner | Lashmeet |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 6 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 7 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heppner vs Lashmeet
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Heppner at 1% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lashmeet at 100% compared to 86% in Heppner.
- Both Heppner and Lashmeet have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Heppner at 6% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Heppner at 7% compared to 0% in Lashmeet.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Heppner and Lashmeet at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heppner | Lashmeet |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 25.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 19.0% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 32.6% |
| Smoking | 16.2% | 27.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 12.2% |
| Obesity | 34.4% | 45.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 35.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heppner vs Lashmeet
- In Lashmeet, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 25.1% compared to 18.5% in Heppner.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lashmeet at 32.6% versus 27.6% in Heppner.
- Lashmeet has a higher smoking rate at 27.7% compared to 16.2% in Heppner.
- Binge drinking is more common in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 12.2% in Lashmeet.
- Lashmeet has higher obesity rates at 45.6% compared to 34.4% in Heppner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 22.0% in Lashmeet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heppner | Lashmeet |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.0% (258) | 25.3% (178) |
| Less than High School | 9.4% (110) | 47.2% (332) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.8% (115) | 5.8% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heppner vs Lashmeet
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Heppner and Lashmeet at 0.0%.
- In Lashmeet, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.3% compared to 22.0% in Heppner.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lashmeet at 47.2%, compared to 9.4% in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heppner hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 5.8% in Lashmeet.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.