Demographics details for Hendersonville, TN vs Flomaton, AL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hendersonville, TN vs Flomaton, AL.

Data Hendersonville Flomaton
Population 62,896 1,458
Median Age 40.0 years 32.6 years
Median Income $86,954 $37,500
Married Families 44.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 5% 15%
Unemployment Rate 2.8 5.2

Population Comparison: Hendersonville vs Flomaton

  • In Hendersonville, the population is higher at 62,896, compared to 1,458 in Flomaton.
  • Residents in Hendersonville have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Flomaton.
  • Hendersonville has a higher median income of $86,954 compared to $37,500 in Flomaton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hendersonville at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Flomaton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Flomaton at 15%, compared to 5% in Hendersonville.
  • Flomaton has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 2.8% in Hendersonville.

Demographics

Demographics Hendersonville vs Flomaton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hendersonville Flomaton
Black 9 38
White 80 58
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 Data is updating
Two or More Races 4 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hendersonville vs Flomaton

  • In Flomaton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 9% in Hendersonville.
  • Hendersonville has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 58% in Flomaton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Hendersonville at 2% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hendersonville at 5% compared to 0% in Flomaton.
  • Both Hendersonville and Flomaton have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hendersonville and Flomaton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hendersonville Flomaton
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 21.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.5% 15.3%
Depression 26.6% 24.6%
Smoking 15.8% 24.1%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 13.7%
Obesity 33.2% 45.3%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hendersonville vs Flomaton

  • In Flomaton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 16.8% in Hendersonville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Hendersonville at 26.6% compared to 24.6% in Flomaton.
  • Flomaton has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 15.8% in Hendersonville.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Hendersonville at 16.1% compared to 13.7% in Flomaton.
  • Flomaton has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 33.2% in Hendersonville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Flomaton at 19.0% compared to 13.0% in Hendersonville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hendersonville Flomaton
No Schooling 0.3% (204) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.0% (8,160) 25.0% (364)
Less than High School 6.4% (4,034) 19.1% (278)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 28.8% (18,116) 9.4% (137)

Education Levels Comparison: Hendersonville vs Flomaton

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hendersonville have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Flomaton.
  • In Flomaton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 13.0% in Hendersonville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Flomaton at 19.1%, compared to 6.4% in Hendersonville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hendersonville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.8% compared to 9.4% in Flomaton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.