Demographics details for Henderson, NV vs Watauga, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Henderson, NV vs Watauga, TX.
Data | Henderson | Watauga |
---|---|---|
Population | 331,415 | 23,050 |
Median Age | 42.3 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $85,311 | $88,775 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Henderson vs Watauga
- In Henderson, the population is higher at 331,415, compared to 23,050 in Watauga.
- Residents in Henderson have a higher median age of 42.3 years compared to 35.8 years in Watauga.
- Watauga has a higher median income of $88,775, compared to $85,311 in Henderson.
- In Watauga, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Henderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Watauga at 10%, compared to 0% in Henderson.
- The unemployment rate in Henderson is higher at 5.9%, compared to 3.5% in Watauga.
Demographics
Demographics Henderson vs Watauga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Henderson | Watauga |
---|---|---|
Black | 6 | 8 |
White | 56 | 46 |
Asian | 9 | 4 |
Hispanic | 18 | 28 |
Two or More Races | 10 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Henderson vs Watauga
- In Watauga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 6% in Henderson.
- Henderson has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 46% in Watauga.
- The Asian population is larger in Henderson at 9% compared to 4% in Watauga.
- Watauga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 28%, compared to 18% in Henderson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Watauga at 12%, compared to 10% in Henderson.
- In Watauga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Henderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Henderson | Watauga |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.0% | 16.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 11.0% |
Depression | 19.5% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 14.7% | 15.4% |
Binge Drinking | 14.7% | 18.0% |
Obesity | 28.6% | 33.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Henderson vs Watauga
- More residents in Henderson report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 16.5% in Watauga.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Watauga at 23.6% versus 19.5% in Henderson.
- Watauga has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 14.7% in Henderson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Watauga at 18.0% compared to 14.7% in Henderson.
- Watauga has higher obesity rates at 33.1% compared to 28.6% in Henderson.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Henderson and Watauga at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Henderson | Watauga |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (2,336) | 0.7% (166) |
High School Diploma | 14.1% (46,801) | 17.6% (4,050) |
Less than High School | 8.1% (26,764) | 12.7% (2,930) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.6% (81,415) | 16.8% (3,869) |
Education Levels Comparison: Henderson vs Watauga
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Henderson and Watauga at 0.7%.
- In Watauga, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 14.1% in Henderson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Watauga at 12.7%, compared to 8.1% in Henderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Henderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.6% compared to 16.8% in Watauga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.