Demographics details for Hemet, CA vs Forest park, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hemet, CA vs Forest park, GA.
| Data | Hemet | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 90,689 | 19,400 |
| Median Age | 39.0 years | 31.3 years |
| Median Income | $49,901 | $41,837 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 7.3 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Hemet vs Forest park
- In Hemet, the population is higher at 90,689, compared to 19,400 in Forest park.
- Residents in Hemet have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 31.3 years in Forest park.
- Hemet has a higher median income of $49,901 compared to $41,837 in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hemet at 35.0% compared to 23.0% in Forest park.
- Hemet has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Forest park.
- The unemployment rate in Hemet is higher at 7.3%, compared to 4.5% in Forest park.
Demographics
Demographics Hemet vs Forest park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hemet | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 55 |
| White | 27 | 8 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 48 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hemet vs Forest park
- In Forest park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 55% compared to 8% in Hemet.
- Hemet has a higher percentage of White residents at 27% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- In Forest park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 3% in Hemet.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hemet at 48% compared to 23% in Forest park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hemet at 13% compared to 8% in Forest park.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Hemet at 1% compared to 0% in Forest park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hemet | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 19.7% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 17.3% | 22.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.8% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | 39.0% | 43.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hemet vs Forest park
- More residents in Hemet report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.3% in Forest park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hemet at 19.7% compared to 17.8% in Forest park.
- Forest park has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 17.3% in Hemet.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hemet at 15.8% compared to 13.3% in Forest park.
- Forest park has higher obesity rates at 43.0% compared to 39.0% in Hemet.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hemet at 20.0% compared to 15.0% in Forest park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hemet | Forest park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.4% (2,217) | 2.6% (504) |
| High School Diploma | 18.6% (16,861) | 18.4% (3,567) |
| Less than High School | 25.5% (23,171) | 21.7% (4,202) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.3% (8,470) | 6.4% (1,235) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hemet vs Forest park
- In Forest park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 2.4% in Hemet.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hemet hold a high school diploma at 18.6% compared to 18.4% in Forest park.
- More residents in Hemet have less than a high school education at 25.5% compared to 21.7% in Forest park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hemet hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.3% compared to 6.4% in Forest park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.