Demographics details for Helper, UT vs Roseville, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Helper, UT vs Roseville, MI.
| Data | Helper | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,131 | 46,812 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 40.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,323 | $57,274 |
| Married Families | 61.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 6.3 |
Population Comparison: Helper vs Roseville
- The population in Roseville is higher at 46,812, compared to 2,131 in Helper.
- Residents in Helper have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 40.7 years in Roseville.
- Helper has a higher median income of $59,323 compared to $57,274 in Roseville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Helper at 61.0% compared to 32.0% in Roseville.
- The poverty level is higher in Roseville at 12%, compared to 11% in Helper.
- Roseville has a higher unemployment rate at 6.3% compared to 2.5% in Helper.
Demographics
Demographics Helper vs Roseville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Helper | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 23 |
| White | 85 | 67 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Helper vs Roseville
- In Roseville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 23% compared to 0% in Helper.
- Helper has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 67% in Roseville.
- In Roseville, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Helper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Helper at 10% compared to 4% in Roseville.
- Both Helper and Roseville have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Helper and Roseville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Helper | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.2% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 23.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 40.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Helper vs Roseville
- In Roseville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.1% in Helper.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Roseville at 26.9% versus 25.3% in Helper.
- Roseville has a higher smoking rate at 23.6% compared to 11.5% in Helper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Roseville at 17.4% compared to 14.2% in Helper.
- Roseville has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 36.9% in Helper.
- Disability percentages are higher in Helper at 26.0% compared to 19.0% in Roseville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Helper | Roseville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.2% (563) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (499) | 21.9% (10,268) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (185) | 14.8% (6,925) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (399) | 10.3% (4,839) |
Education Levels Comparison: Helper vs Roseville
- In Roseville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Helper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helper hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 21.9% in Roseville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Roseville at 14.8%, compared to 8.7% in Helper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 10.3% in Roseville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.