Demographics details for Helper, UT vs Corcoran, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Helper, UT vs Corcoran, CA.
Data | Helper | Corcoran |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,131 | 22,837 |
Median Age | 43.2 years | 34.0 years |
Median Income | $59,323 | $53,103 |
Married Families | 61.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 20% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 16.7 |
Population Comparison: Helper vs Corcoran
- The population in Corcoran is higher at 22,837, compared to 2,131 in Helper.
- Residents in Helper have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 34.0 years in Corcoran.
- Helper has a higher median income of $59,323 compared to $53,103 in Corcoran.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Helper at 61.0% compared to 25.0% in Corcoran.
- The poverty level is higher in Corcoran at 20%, compared to 11% in Helper.
- Corcoran has a higher unemployment rate at 16.7% compared to 2.5% in Helper.
Demographics
Demographics Helper vs Corcoran provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Helper | Corcoran |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 10 |
White | 85 | -8 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 10 | 74 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 20 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Helper vs Corcoran
- In Corcoran, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 0% in Helper.
- Helper has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to -8% in Corcoran.
- In Corcoran, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Helper.
- Corcoran has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 74%, compared to 10% in Helper.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Corcoran at 20%, compared to 5% in Helper.
- In Corcoran, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Helper.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Helper | Corcoran |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 17.8% |
Depression | 25.3% | 17.4% |
Smoking | 11.5% | 22.0% |
Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.5% |
Obesity | 36.9% | 40.7% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Helper vs Corcoran
- In Corcoran, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 17.1% in Helper.
- Depression is more prevalent in Helper at 25.3% compared to 17.4% in Corcoran.
- Corcoran has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 11.5% in Helper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Corcoran at 15.5% compared to 14.2% in Helper.
- Corcoran has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 36.9% in Helper.
- Disability percentages are higher in Helper at 26.0% compared to 9.0% in Corcoran.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Helper | Corcoran |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.5% (343) |
High School Diploma | 23.4% (499) | 16.3% (3,728) |
Less than High School | 8.7% (185) | 53.2% (12,144) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (399) | 2.7% (612) |
Education Levels Comparison: Helper vs Corcoran
- In Corcoran, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Helper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helper hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 16.3% in Corcoran.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Corcoran at 53.2%, compared to 8.7% in Helper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 2.7% in Corcoran.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.