Demographics details for Helper, UT vs Anderson, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Helper, UT vs Anderson, IN.
| Data | Helper | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,131 | 55,099 |
| Median Age | 43.2 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,323 | $44,974 |
| Married Families | 61.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Helper vs Anderson
- The population in Anderson is higher at 55,099, compared to 2,131 in Helper.
- Residents in Helper have a higher median age of 43.2 years compared to 38.8 years in Anderson.
- Helper has a higher median income of $59,323 compared to $44,974 in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Helper at 61.0% compared to 31.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Anderson at 12%, compared to 11% in Helper.
- Anderson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 2.5% in Helper.
Demographics
Demographics Helper vs Anderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Helper | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 15 |
| White | 85 | 72 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Helper vs Anderson
- In Anderson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Helper.
- Helper has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 72% in Anderson.
- In Anderson, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Helper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Helper at 10% compared to 7% in Anderson.
- Both Helper and Anderson have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Helper and Anderson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Helper | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 25.3% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 11.5% | 25.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 36.9% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Helper vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.1% in Helper.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Anderson at 27.1% versus 25.3% in Helper.
- Anderson has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 11.5% in Helper.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Anderson at 15.0% compared to 14.2% in Helper.
- Anderson has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 36.9% in Helper.
- Disability percentages are higher in Helper at 26.0% compared to 22.0% in Anderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Helper | Anderson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (436) |
| High School Diploma | 23.4% (499) | 22.3% (12,278) |
| Less than High School | 8.7% (185) | 15.8% (8,680) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.7% (399) | 11.1% (6,109) |
Education Levels Comparison: Helper vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Helper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helper hold a high school diploma at 23.4% compared to 22.3% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Anderson at 15.8%, compared to 8.7% in Helper.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helper hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 11.1% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.