Demographics details for Helotes, TX vs Central point, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Helotes, TX vs Central point, OR.
Data | Helotes | Central point |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,597 | 19,222 |
Median Age | 44.6 years | 40.3 years |
Median Income | $124,367 | $79,731 |
Married Families | 46.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 4% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Helotes vs Central point
- The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 9,597 in Helotes.
- Residents in Helotes have a higher median age of 44.6 years compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
- Helotes has a higher median income of $124,367 compared to $79,731 in Central point.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Helotes at 46.0% compared to 45.0% in Central point.
- The poverty level is higher in Central point at 10%, compared to 4% in Helotes.
- Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.2% in Helotes.
Demographics
Demographics Helotes vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Helotes | Central point |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 28 | 76 |
Asian | 3 | 1 |
Hispanic | 49 | 15 |
Two or More Races | 16 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Helotes vs Central point
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Helotes at 3% compared to 0% in Central point.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 28% in Helotes.
- The Asian population is larger in Helotes at 3% compared to 1% in Central point.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Helotes at 49% compared to 15% in Central point.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Helotes at 16% compared to 7% in Central point.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Helotes and Central point at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Helotes | Central point |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.5% | 12.0% |
Depression | 23.4% | 29.4% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 16.5% |
Obesity | 32.2% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Helotes vs Central point
- In Central point, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 14.4% in Helotes.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 23.4% in Helotes.
- Central point has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 9.4% in Helotes.
- Binge drinking is more common in Helotes at 19.9% compared to 16.5% in Central point.
- Obesity rates are higher in Helotes at 32.2% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Helotes and Central point at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Helotes | Central point |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.3% (128) | 1.7% (319) |
High School Diploma | 7.9% (757) | 16.1% (3,095) |
Less than High School | 4.9% (472) | 13.2% (2,530) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.2% (3,190) | 15.6% (3,003) |
Education Levels Comparison: Helotes vs Central point
- In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.3% in Helotes.
- In Central point, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.1% compared to 7.9% in Helotes.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central point at 13.2%, compared to 4.9% in Helotes.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helotes hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.2% compared to 15.6% in Central point.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.