Demographics details for Helena, MT vs Fort thomas, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Helena, MT vs Fort thomas, KY.
Data | Helena | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,885 | 17,133 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $64,798 | $95,391 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Helena vs Fort thomas
- In Helena, the population is higher at 33,885, compared to 17,133 in Fort thomas.
- Residents in Helena have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 37.9 years in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has a higher median income of $95,391, compared to $64,798 in Helena.
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 34.0% in Helena.
- Helena has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Fort thomas.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Helena and Fort thomas at 3.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Helena vs Fort thomas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Helena | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 2 |
White | 88 | 92 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Helena vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Helena.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort thomas at 92% compared to 88% in Helena.
- Both Helena and Fort thomas have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Helena at 5% compared to 1% in Fort thomas.
- Both Helena and Fort thomas have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Helena at 1% compared to 0% in Fort thomas.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Helena | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 9.7% |
Depression | 23.5% | 26.2% |
Smoking | 13.1% | 13.6% |
Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 17.1% |
Obesity | 30.4% | 32.4% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Helena vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.8% in Helena.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort thomas at 26.2% versus 23.5% in Helena.
- Fort thomas has a higher smoking rate at 13.6% compared to 13.1% in Helena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Helena at 21.9% compared to 17.1% in Fort thomas.
- Fort thomas has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 30.4% in Helena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Helena at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Fort thomas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Helena | Fort thomas |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (38) | 0.4% (66) |
High School Diploma | 10.0% (3,385) | 10.7% (1,840) |
Less than High School | 4.7% (1,597) | 3.3% (569) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.3% (11,632) | 37.3% (6,383) |
Education Levels Comparison: Helena vs Fort thomas
- In Fort thomas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Helena.
- In Fort thomas, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.7% compared to 10.0% in Helena.
- More residents in Helena have less than a high school education at 4.7% compared to 3.3% in Fort thomas.
- In Fort thomas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 34.3% in Helena.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.