Demographics details for Helena, MT vs Cincinnati, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Helena, MT vs Cincinnati, OH.
Data | Helena | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,885 | 309,513 |
Median Age | 39.9 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $64,798 | $49,191 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 17% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.8 |
Population Comparison: Helena vs Cincinnati
- The population in Cincinnati is higher at 309,513, compared to 33,885 in Helena.
- Residents in Helena have a higher median age of 39.9 years compared to 32.9 years in Cincinnati.
- Helena has a higher median income of $64,798 compared to $49,191 in Cincinnati.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Helena at 34.0% compared to 24.0% in Cincinnati.
- The poverty level is higher in Cincinnati at 17%, compared to 10% in Helena.
- Cincinnati has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 3.0% in Helena.
Demographics
Demographics Helena vs Cincinnati provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Helena | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 40 |
White | 88 | 46 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Helena vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 1% in Helena.
- Helena has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 46% in Cincinnati.
- In Cincinnati, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Helena.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Helena and Cincinnati at 5%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cincinnati at 6%, compared to 4% in Helena.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Helena at 1% compared to 0% in Cincinnati.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Helena | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.8% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.1% |
Depression | 23.5% | 21.6% |
Smoking | 13.1% | 21.3% |
Binge Drinking | 21.9% | 18.2% |
Obesity | 30.4% | 39.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Helena vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.8% in Helena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Helena at 23.5% compared to 21.6% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 13.1% in Helena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Helena at 21.9% compared to 18.2% in Cincinnati.
- Cincinnati has higher obesity rates at 39.8% compared to 30.4% in Helena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cincinnati at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Helena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Helena | Cincinnati |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (38) | 0.9% (2,632) |
High School Diploma | 10.0% (3,385) | 12.5% (38,643) |
Less than High School | 4.7% (1,597) | 9.6% (29,753) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 34.3% (11,632) | 26.4% (81,592) |
Education Levels Comparison: Helena vs Cincinnati
- In Cincinnati, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Helena.
- In Cincinnati, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.5% compared to 10.0% in Helena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cincinnati at 9.6%, compared to 4.7% in Helena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.3% compared to 26.4% in Cincinnati.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.