Demographics details for Helena, AL vs Jefferson, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Helena, AL vs Jefferson, SD.
| Data | Helena | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 21,862 | 457 |
| Median Age | 38.2 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $107,360 | $77,601 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 59.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.8 | 2.3 |
Population Comparison: Helena vs Jefferson
- In Helena, the population is higher at 21,862, compared to 457 in Jefferson.
- Residents in Helena have a higher median age of 38.2 years compared to 37.1 years in Jefferson.
- Helena has a higher median income of $107,360 compared to $77,601 in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, the percentage of married families is higher at 59.0%, compared to 46.0% in Helena.
- Helena has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Jefferson.
- The unemployment rate in Helena is higher at 2.8%, compared to 2.3% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Helena vs Jefferson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Helena | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 18 | Data is updating |
| White | 73 | 85 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Helena vs Jefferson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Helena at 18% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jefferson at 85% compared to 73% in Helena.
- The Asian population is larger in Helena at 1% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Helena.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Helena at 5% compared to 4% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Helena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Helena | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.6% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 21.9% | 16.7% |
| Smoking | 11.8% | 14.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.0% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 32.1% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Helena vs Jefferson
- More residents in Helena report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 12.5% in Jefferson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Helena at 21.9% compared to 16.7% in Jefferson.
- Jefferson has a higher smoking rate at 14.5% compared to 11.8% in Helena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jefferson at 20.4% compared to 18.0% in Helena.
- Jefferson has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 32.1% in Helena.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jefferson at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Helena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Helena | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (106) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 9.7% (2,129) | 22.3% (102) |
| Less than High School | 3.4% (749) | 7.9% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 30.8% (6,741) | 23.0% (105) |
Education Levels Comparison: Helena vs Jefferson
- A higher percentage of residents in Helena have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 9.7% in Helena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jefferson at 7.9%, compared to 3.4% in Helena.
- A higher percentage of residents in Helena hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.8% compared to 23.0% in Jefferson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.