Demographics details for Heber springs, AR vs Whiting, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heber springs, AR vs Whiting, KS.
Data | Heber springs | Whiting |
---|---|---|
Population | 7,201 | 195 |
Median Age | 43.1 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $50,472 | $52,000 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | Data is updating |
Population Comparison: Heber springs vs Whiting
- In Heber springs, the population is higher at 7,201, compared to 195 in Whiting.
- Residents in Heber springs have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 33.7 years in Whiting.
- Whiting has a higher median income of $52,000, compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
- In Whiting, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 41.0% in Heber springs.
- Heber springs has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- The unemployment rate in Heber springs is higher at 4.0%, compared to 0.0% in Whiting.
Demographics
Demographics Heber springs vs Whiting provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Heber springs | Whiting |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 87 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heber springs vs Whiting
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Heber springs at 1% compared to 0% in Whiting.
- Heber springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 87% in Whiting.
- Both Heber springs and Whiting have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Heber springs at 3% compared to 2% in Whiting.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Whiting at 11%, compared to 3% in Heber springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Heber springs at 1% compared to 0% in Whiting.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Heber springs | Whiting |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 16.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 9.9% |
Depression | 26.3% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 20.5% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 36.2% | 39.3% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heber springs vs Whiting
- More residents in Heber springs report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.1% in Whiting.
- Depression is more prevalent in Heber springs at 26.3% compared to 22.9% in Whiting.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Heber springs at 20.5% compared to 17.9% in Whiting.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whiting at 19.3% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
- Whiting has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 36.2% in Heber springs.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heber springs at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Whiting.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Heber springs | Whiting |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 23.5% (1,694) | 28.7% (56) |
Less than High School | 15.1% (1,088) | 9.2% (18) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (756) | 14.9% (29) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heber springs vs Whiting
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Heber springs and Whiting at 0.0%.
- In Whiting, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 23.5% in Heber springs.
- More residents in Heber springs have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 9.2% in Whiting.
- In Whiting, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.9% compared to 10.5% in Heber springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.