Demographics details for Heber springs, AR vs Parker, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Heber springs, AR vs Parker, CO.
| Data | Heber springs | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,201 | 61,222 |
| Median Age | 43.1 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $50,472 | $126,615 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Heber springs vs Parker
- The population in Parker is higher at 61,222, compared to 7,201 in Heber springs.
- Residents in Heber springs have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 35.7 years in Parker.
- Parker has a higher median income of $126,615, compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
- In Parker, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 41.0% in Heber springs.
- Heber springs has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Parker.
- The unemployment rate in Heber springs is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.9% in Parker.
Demographics
Demographics Heber springs vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Heber springs | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 92 | 73 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Heber springs vs Parker
- In Parker, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Heber springs.
- Heber springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 73% in Parker.
- In Parker, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Heber springs.
- Parker has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Heber springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parker at 8%, compared to 3% in Heber springs.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Heber springs at 1% compared to 0% in Parker.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Heber springs | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 12.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 8.1% |
| Depression | 26.3% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 20.5% | 9.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.2% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 36.2% | 23.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Heber springs vs Parker
- More residents in Heber springs report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 12.9% in Parker.
- Depression is more prevalent in Heber springs at 26.3% compared to 19.2% in Parker.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Heber springs at 20.5% compared to 9.8% in Parker.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Parker at 18.9% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Heber springs at 36.2% compared to 23.7% in Parker.
- Disability percentages are higher in Heber springs at 20.0% compared to 5.0% in Parker.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Heber springs | Parker |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.7% (432) |
| High School Diploma | 23.5% (1,694) | 6.8% (4,185) |
| Less than High School | 15.1% (1,088) | 4.4% (2,679) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.5% (756) | 32.8% (20,066) |
Education Levels Comparison: Heber springs vs Parker
- In Parker, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Heber springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Heber springs hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 6.8% in Parker.
- More residents in Heber springs have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 4.4% in Parker.
- In Parker, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 32.8% compared to 10.5% in Heber springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.