Demographics details for Heber springs, AR vs Irving, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Heber springs, AR vs Irving, IL.

Data Heber springs Irving
Population 7,201 370
Median Age 43.1 years 42.1 years
Median Income $50,472 $50,000
Married Families 41.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Heber springs vs Irving

  • In Heber springs, the population is higher at 7,201, compared to 370 in Irving.
  • Residents in Heber springs have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 42.1 years in Irving.
  • Heber springs has a higher median income of $50,472 compared to $50,000 in Irving.
  • In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Heber springs.
  • Heber springs has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Irving.
  • Irving has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Heber springs.

Demographics

Demographics Heber springs vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Heber springs Irving
Black 1 1
White 92 91
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 4
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Heber springs vs Irving

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Heber springs and Irving at 1%.
  • Heber springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 91% in Irving.
  • Both Heber springs and Irving have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Irving has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Heber springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irving at 4%, compared to 3% in Heber springs.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Heber springs at 1% compared to 0% in Irving.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Heber springs Irving
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 18.6%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 13.4%
Depression 26.3% 24.0%
Smoking 20.5% 22.1%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 17.3%
Obesity 36.2% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Heber springs vs Irving

  • In Irving, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 18.5% in Heber springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Heber springs at 26.3% compared to 24.0% in Irving.
  • Irving has a higher smoking rate at 22.1% compared to 20.5% in Heber springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Irving at 17.3% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
  • Irving has higher obesity rates at 39.5% compared to 36.2% in Heber springs.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Heber springs and Irving at 20.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Heber springs Irving
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.5% (1,694) 24.9% (92)
Less than High School 15.1% (1,088) 20.5% (76)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.5% (756) 9.2% (34)

Education Levels Comparison: Heber springs vs Irving

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Heber springs and Irving at 0.0%.
  • In Irving, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.9% compared to 23.5% in Heber springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 20.5%, compared to 15.1% in Heber springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Heber springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.5% compared to 9.2% in Irving.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.