Demographics details for Heber springs, AR vs Columbiana, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Heber springs, AR vs Columbiana, OH.

Data Heber springs Columbiana
Population 7,201 100,511
Median Age 43.1 years 44.5 years
Median Income $50,472 $55,473
Married Families 41.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.8

Population Comparison: Heber springs vs Columbiana

  • The population in Columbiana is higher at 100,511, compared to 7,201 in Heber springs.
  • The median age in Columbiana is higher at 44.5 years, compared to 43.1 years in Heber springs.
  • Columbiana has a higher median income of $55,473, compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Heber springs at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Columbiana.
  • Heber springs has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Columbiana.
  • Columbiana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.8% compared to 4.0% in Heber springs.

Demographics

Demographics Heber springs vs Columbiana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Heber springs Columbiana
Black 1 2
White 92 93
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 3 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Heber springs vs Columbiana

  • In Columbiana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Heber springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Columbiana at 93% compared to 92% in Heber springs.
  • Both Heber springs and Columbiana have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Heber springs at 3% compared to 2% in Columbiana.
  • Both Heber springs and Columbiana have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Heber springs at 1% compared to 0% in Columbiana.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Heber springs Columbiana
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 12.5%
Depression 26.3% 23.8%
Smoking 20.5% 22.5%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 17.6%
Obesity 36.2% 45.3%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Heber springs vs Columbiana

  • More residents in Heber springs report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.4% in Columbiana.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Heber springs at 26.3% compared to 23.8% in Columbiana.
  • Columbiana has a higher smoking rate at 22.5% compared to 20.5% in Heber springs.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Columbiana at 17.6% compared to 16.2% in Heber springs.
  • Columbiana has higher obesity rates at 45.3% compared to 36.2% in Heber springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Heber springs at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Columbiana.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Heber springs Columbiana
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (1,010)
High School Diploma 23.5% (1,694) 29.8% (29,903)
Less than High School 15.1% (1,088) 14.3% (14,400)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.5% (756) 12.1% (12,129)

Education Levels Comparison: Heber springs vs Columbiana

  • In Columbiana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Heber springs.
  • In Columbiana, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.8% compared to 23.5% in Heber springs.
  • More residents in Heber springs have less than a high school education at 15.1% compared to 14.3% in Columbiana.
  • In Columbiana, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.1% compared to 10.5% in Heber springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.