Demographics details for Heber springs, AR vs Arrington, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Heber springs, AR vs Arrington, VA.

Data Heber springs Arrington
Population 7,201 1,226
Median Age 43.1 years 31.3 years
Median Income $50,472 $58,144
Married Families 41.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 12% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Heber springs vs Arrington

  • In Heber springs, the population is higher at 7,201, compared to 1,226 in Arrington.
  • Residents in Heber springs have a higher median age of 43.1 years compared to 31.3 years in Arrington.
  • Arrington has a higher median income of $58,144, compared to $50,472 in Heber springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Heber springs at 41.0% compared to 40.0% in Arrington.
  • Heber springs has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Arrington.
  • The unemployment rate in Heber springs is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Arrington.

Demographics

Demographics Heber springs vs Arrington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Heber springs Arrington
Black 1 41
White 92 59
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 3 Data is updating
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Heber springs vs Arrington

  • In Arrington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 41% compared to 1% in Heber springs.
  • Heber springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 59% in Arrington.
  • Both Heber springs and Arrington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Heber springs at 3% compared to 0% in Arrington.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Heber springs at 3% compared to 0% in Arrington.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Heber springs at 1% compared to 0% in Arrington.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Heber springs Arrington
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 19.7%
Physical Health Not Good 12.5% 14.0%
Depression 26.3% 25.2%
Smoking 20.5% 23.1%
Binge Drinking 16.2% 15.3%
Obesity 36.2% 42.4%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 6.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Heber springs vs Arrington

  • In Arrington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.5% in Heber springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Heber springs at 26.3% compared to 25.2% in Arrington.
  • Arrington has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 20.5% in Heber springs.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Heber springs at 16.2% compared to 15.3% in Arrington.
  • Arrington has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 36.2% in Heber springs.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Heber springs at 20.0% compared to 6.0% in Arrington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Heber springs Arrington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 23.5% (1,694) 17.0% (208)
Less than High School 15.1% (1,088) 21.2% (260)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 10.5% (756) 20.1% (247)

Education Levels Comparison: Heber springs vs Arrington

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Heber springs and Arrington at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Heber springs hold a high school diploma at 23.5% compared to 17.0% in Arrington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Arrington at 21.2%, compared to 15.1% in Heber springs.
  • In Arrington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.1% compared to 10.5% in Heber springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.