Demographics details for Hazlehurst, MS vs Wichita falls, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hazlehurst, MS vs Wichita falls, TX.

Data Hazlehurst Wichita falls
Population 3,497 102,664
Median Age 36.5 years 32.8 years
Median Income $38,365 $55,584
Married Families 24.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 30% 14%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.9

Population Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Wichita falls

  • The population in Wichita falls is higher at 102,664, compared to 3,497 in Hazlehurst.
  • Residents in Hazlehurst have a higher median age of 36.5 years compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher median income of $55,584, compared to $38,365 in Hazlehurst.
  • In Wichita falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 24.0% in Hazlehurst.
  • Hazlehurst has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 14% in Wichita falls.
  • Wichita falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.3% in Hazlehurst.

Demographics

Demographics Hazlehurst vs Wichita falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hazlehurst Wichita falls
Black 86 12
White 6 54
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 8 22
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Wichita falls

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hazlehurst at 86% compared to 12% in Wichita falls.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Wichita falls at 54% compared to 6% in Hazlehurst.
  • In Wichita falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Hazlehurst.
  • Wichita falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 8% in Hazlehurst.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wichita falls at 8%, compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.
  • In Wichita falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hazlehurst Wichita falls
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 12.5%
Depression 19.9% 24.6%
Smoking 24.9% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 11.3% 18.7%
Obesity 48.7% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Wichita falls

  • More residents in Hazlehurst report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 18.3% in Wichita falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wichita falls at 24.6% versus 19.9% in Hazlehurst.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hazlehurst at 24.9% compared to 18.6% in Wichita falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 11.3% in Hazlehurst.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hazlehurst at 48.7% compared to 37.1% in Wichita falls.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hazlehurst at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Wichita falls.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hazlehurst Wichita falls
No Schooling 2.7% (95) 1.0% (1,035)
High School Diploma 16.1% (562) 15.1% (15,510)
Less than High School 15.5% (541) 14.6% (14,970)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (573) 15.1% (15,550)

Education Levels Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Wichita falls

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hazlehurst have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.0% in Wichita falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hazlehurst hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
  • More residents in Hazlehurst have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 14.6% in Wichita falls.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Hazlehurst hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.