Demographics details for Hazlehurst, MS vs Seaside park, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hazlehurst, MS vs Seaside park, NJ.

Data Hazlehurst Seaside park
Population 3,497 1,473
Median Age 36.5 years 59.5 years
Median Income $38,365 $80,658
Married Families 24.0% 57.0%
Poverty Level 30% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.1

Population Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Seaside park

  • In Hazlehurst, the population is higher at 3,497, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
  • The median age in Seaside park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 36.5 years in Hazlehurst.
  • Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658, compared to $38,365 in Hazlehurst.
  • In Seaside park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 24.0% in Hazlehurst.
  • Hazlehurst has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 5% in Seaside park.
  • The unemployment rate in Hazlehurst is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.1% in Seaside park.

Demographics

Demographics Hazlehurst vs Seaside park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hazlehurst Seaside park
Black 86 3
White 6 90
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic 8 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Seaside park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hazlehurst at 86% compared to 3% in Seaside park.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Seaside park at 90% compared to 6% in Hazlehurst.
  • In Seaside park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Hazlehurst.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hazlehurst at 8% compared to 1% in Seaside park.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Seaside park at 2%, compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hazlehurst and Seaside park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hazlehurst Seaside park
Mental Health Not Good 18.5% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.5% 10.1%
Depression 19.9% 23.1%
Smoking 24.9% 13.2%
Binge Drinking 11.3% 18.2%
Obesity 48.7% 30.7%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Seaside park

  • More residents in Hazlehurst report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.4% in Seaside park.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Seaside park at 23.1% versus 19.9% in Hazlehurst.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hazlehurst at 24.9% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Seaside park at 18.2% compared to 11.3% in Hazlehurst.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Hazlehurst at 48.7% compared to 30.7% in Seaside park.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Hazlehurst at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Seaside park.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hazlehurst Seaside park
No Schooling 2.7% (95) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 16.1% (562) 22.2% (327)
Less than High School 15.5% (541) 3.3% (49)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.4% (573) 56.3% (830)

Education Levels Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Seaside park

  • A higher percentage of residents in Hazlehurst have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
  • In Seaside park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 16.1% in Hazlehurst.
  • More residents in Hazlehurst have less than a high school education at 15.5% compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
  • In Seaside park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 16.4% in Hazlehurst.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.