Demographics details for Hazlehurst, MS vs Gardena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hazlehurst, MS vs Gardena, CA.
Data | Hazlehurst | Gardena |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,497 | 58,843 |
Median Age | 36.5 years | 40.1 years |
Median Income | $38,365 | $75,443 |
Married Families | 24.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Gardena
- The population in Gardena is higher at 58,843, compared to 3,497 in Hazlehurst.
- The median age in Gardena is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 36.5 years in Hazlehurst.
- Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443, compared to $38,365 in Hazlehurst.
- In Gardena, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 24.0% in Hazlehurst.
- Hazlehurst has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 15% in Gardena.
- Gardena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.3% in Hazlehurst.
Demographics
Demographics Hazlehurst vs Gardena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Hazlehurst | Gardena |
---|---|---|
Black | 86 | 20 |
White | 6 | -5 |
Asian | Data is updating | 25 |
Hispanic | 8 | 44 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Gardena
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hazlehurst at 86% compared to 20% in Gardena.
- Hazlehurst has a higher percentage of White residents at 6% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- In Gardena, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 0% in Hazlehurst.
- Gardena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 8% in Hazlehurst.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.
- In Gardena, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Hazlehurst.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Hazlehurst | Gardena |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.5% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 10.9% |
Depression | 19.9% | 13.8% |
Smoking | 24.9% | 11.3% |
Binge Drinking | 11.3% | 13.5% |
Obesity | 48.7% | 28.1% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Gardena
- More residents in Hazlehurst report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hazlehurst at 19.9% compared to 13.8% in Gardena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hazlehurst at 24.9% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gardena at 13.5% compared to 11.3% in Hazlehurst.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hazlehurst at 48.7% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hazlehurst at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Hazlehurst | Gardena |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (95) | 3.0% (1,776) |
High School Diploma | 16.1% (562) | 15.0% (8,829) |
Less than High School | 15.5% (541) | 26.5% (15,605) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.4% (573) | 19.8% (11,669) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hazlehurst vs Gardena
- In Gardena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 2.7% in Hazlehurst.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazlehurst hold a high school diploma at 16.1% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardena at 26.5%, compared to 15.5% in Hazlehurst.
- In Gardena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 16.4% in Hazlehurst.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.