Demographics details for Hazelwood, MO vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hazelwood, MO vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Hazelwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 25,047 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $55,111 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Hazelwood vs Coalinga
- In Hazelwood, the population is higher at 25,047, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Hazelwood have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $55,111 in Hazelwood.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Hazelwood.
- The poverty level is identical in both Hazelwood and Coalinga at 15%.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.3% in Hazelwood.
Demographics
Demographics Hazelwood vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hazelwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 4 |
| White | 47 | 9 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hazelwood vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Hazelwood at 40% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Hazelwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 47% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- Both Hazelwood and Coalinga have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 3% in Hazelwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 8% in Hazelwood.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Hazelwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hazelwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 19.9% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.5% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.1% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hazelwood vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.8% in Hazelwood.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hazelwood at 22.9% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hazelwood at 19.9% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hazelwood at 18.5% compared to 15.9% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.1% in Hazelwood.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Hazelwood and Coalinga at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hazelwood | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (221) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 16.6% (4,164) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 7.9% (1,975) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.2% (5,060) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hazelwood vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 0.9% in Hazelwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazelwood hold a high school diploma at 16.6% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 7.9% in Hazelwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazelwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.2% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.