Demographics details for Hazelton, ID vs Rockford, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hazelton, ID vs Rockford, WA.
| Data | Hazelton | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 814 | 565 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 50.4 years |
| Median Income | $44,468 | $68,750 |
| Married Families | 62.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Hazelton vs Rockford
- In Hazelton, the population is higher at 814, compared to 565 in Rockford.
- The median age in Rockford is higher at 50.4 years, compared to 36.3 years in Hazelton.
- Rockford has a higher median income of $68,750, compared to $44,468 in Hazelton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hazelton at 62.0% compared to 33.0% in Rockford.
- Hazelton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Rockford.
- Rockford has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Hazelton.
Demographics
Demographics Hazelton vs Rockford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hazelton | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 85 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 73 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 29 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Hazelton vs Rockford
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Hazelton and Rockford at 0%.
- Hazelton has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 84% in Rockford.
- Both Hazelton and Rockford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hazelton at 73% compared to 4% in Rockford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hazelton at 29% compared to 10% in Rockford.
- In Rockford, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Hazelton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hazelton | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.3% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 22.8% | 28.8% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.9% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 38.5% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hazelton vs Rockford
- In Rockford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 17.3% in Hazelton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rockford at 28.8% versus 22.8% in Hazelton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Hazelton at 19.3% compared to 15.2% in Rockford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rockford at 18.4% compared to 14.9% in Hazelton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Hazelton at 38.5% compared to 29.9% in Rockford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rockford at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Hazelton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hazelton | Rockford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (4) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 18.2% (148) | 11.9% (67) |
| Less than High School | 72.0% (586) | 7.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.0% (49) | 12.9% (73) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hazelton vs Rockford
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazelton have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Rockford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazelton hold a high school diploma at 18.2% compared to 11.9% in Rockford.
- More residents in Hazelton have less than a high school education at 72.0% compared to 7.4% in Rockford.
- In Rockford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.9% compared to 6.0% in Hazelton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.