Demographics details for Hazelton, ID vs Cuyahoga falls, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Hazelton, ID vs Cuyahoga falls, OH.

Data Hazelton Cuyahoga falls
Population 814 50,655
Median Age 36.3 years 37.8 years
Median Income $44,468 $67,922
Married Families 62.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 15% 7%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.8

Population Comparison: Hazelton vs Cuyahoga falls

  • The population in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 50,655, compared to 814 in Hazelton.
  • The median age in Cuyahoga falls is higher at 37.8 years, compared to 36.3 years in Hazelton.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher median income of $67,922, compared to $44,468 in Hazelton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Hazelton at 62.0% compared to 41.0% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Hazelton has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Cuyahoga falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.5% in Hazelton.

Demographics

Demographics Hazelton vs Cuyahoga falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Hazelton Cuyahoga falls
Black Data is updating 5
White 85 81
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 73 3
Two or More Races 29 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Hazelton vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Hazelton.
  • Hazelton has a higher percentage of White residents at 85% compared to 81% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Hazelton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Hazelton at 73% compared to 3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Hazelton at 29% compared to 5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hazelton and Cuyahoga falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Hazelton Cuyahoga falls
Mental Health Not Good 17.3% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 14.0% 11.1%
Depression 22.8% 25.1%
Smoking 19.3% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 14.9% 18.8%
Obesity 38.5% 41.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Hazelton vs Cuyahoga falls

  • More residents in Hazelton report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cuyahoga falls at 25.1% versus 22.8% in Hazelton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Hazelton at 19.3% compared to 18.5% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cuyahoga falls at 18.8% compared to 14.9% in Hazelton.
  • Cuyahoga falls has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 38.5% in Hazelton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cuyahoga falls at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Hazelton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Hazelton Cuyahoga falls
No Schooling 0.5% (4) 1.6% (825)
High School Diploma 18.2% (148) 19.4% (9,813)
Less than High School 72.0% (586) 6.3% (3,197)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 6.0% (49) 26.1% (13,215)

Education Levels Comparison: Hazelton vs Cuyahoga falls

  • In Cuyahoga falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.5% in Hazelton.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 18.2% in Hazelton.
  • More residents in Hazelton have less than a high school education at 72.0% compared to 6.3% in Cuyahoga falls.
  • In Cuyahoga falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 6.0% in Hazelton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.