Demographics details for Hazel, KY vs Monroe, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Hazel, KY vs Monroe, LA.
| Data | Hazel | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 398 | 46,820 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $36,765 | $36,550 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 23.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 24% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Hazel vs Monroe
- The population in Monroe is higher at 46,820, compared to 398 in Hazel.
- Residents in Hazel have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 34.3 years in Monroe.
- Hazel has a higher median income of $36,765 compared to $36,550 in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Hazel at 38.0% compared to 23.0% in Monroe.
- The poverty level is higher in Monroe at 24%, compared to 14% in Hazel.
- Monroe has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 5.0% in Hazel.
Demographics
Demographics Hazel vs Monroe provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Hazel | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 62 |
| White | 76 | 33 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Hazel vs Monroe
- In Monroe, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 10% in Hazel.
- Hazel has a higher percentage of White residents at 76% compared to 33% in Monroe.
- The Asian population is larger in Hazel at 5% compared to 2% in Monroe.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Hazel at 3% compared to 2% in Monroe.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Hazel at 6% compared to 1% in Monroe.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Hazel and Monroe at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Hazel | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 21.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.5% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 27.6% | 23.8% |
| Smoking | 19.0% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 38.9% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 35.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Hazel vs Monroe
- In Monroe, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 18.3% in Hazel.
- Depression is more prevalent in Hazel at 27.6% compared to 23.8% in Monroe.
- Monroe has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 19.0% in Hazel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Hazel at 15.0% compared to 14.3% in Monroe.
- Monroe has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 38.9% in Hazel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Hazel at 35.0% compared to 13.0% in Monroe.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Hazel | Monroe |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (3) | 0.7% (320) |
| High School Diploma | 21.9% (87) | 16.8% (7,877) |
| Less than High School | 21.1% (84) | 10.9% (5,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.0% (36) | 17.1% (8,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Hazel vs Monroe
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazel have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Monroe.
- A higher percentage of residents in Hazel hold a high school diploma at 21.9% compared to 16.8% in Monroe.
- More residents in Hazel have less than a high school education at 21.1% compared to 10.9% in Monroe.
- In Monroe, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 9.0% in Hazel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.